How Much Alcohol Can You Drink Safely?
It’s pretty easy to see the harm that heavy drinking causes. What we have so far struggled to demonstrate is how much damage small amounts of ‘social’ drinking does?
So many casual drinkers claim that it is not only safe but it is a health benefit!
Last year, the distinguished medical journal ‘The Lancet’ released a report that is believed to be one of the most extensive worldwide evaluations on the dangers of alcohol use. Its outcome, which the press extensively reported, seemed indisputable: “The safest amount of alcohol consumption is zero.”
Is there REALLY a safe amount of alcohol?
There are so many conflicting headlines that we have almost become data blind. “There’s so much data on sugar, caffeine, and booze,” states Nick Steneck, a specialist to U.S.A Department of Health.
“You essentially believe what you wish to believe unless you start to see people dropping down dead everywhere.”
Clinical reports are created mainly for other clinical professionals. However, to make educated choices, we the members of the public need to interact with them, as well. Does our present way of doing this, news headline by news headline, verdict by verdict, make us more educated as a society or just more confused?
We need research but it comes with a challenge
“If we get so overwhelmed that we just ignore all study results, how do we make decisions?
For example, we need research like this because you can’t study the risks of drunk driving by asking people to do it and report the results, etc.
However, because researchers may only monitor, not manage, the conditions in which their targets act, there are also a large and an unidentified variety of factors acting upon those people, which means these kinds of research studies can not state for sure that one factor triggers another.
This sort of health research began life in the 1950s in the United States and the United Kingdom.
Confusing stories are spreading
What they discovered when they considered alcohol use, particularly, was perplexing:
Individuals who stated being modest drinkers had a tendency to have a reduced risk of death and numerous particular health issues than teetotalers did suffer with. Does this mean that a specific quantity of booze provides a “defensive” benefit? And if so, how much?
In the early nineties, a prominent report in ‘The Lancet’ noted that the French had a considerably reduced level of coronary myocardial infarction, even though the French generally consumed elevated amounts of saturated fat. The explanation, the publishers suggested, must be that the French drank considerably more red wine.
A complete leap in the dark!
The concept that alcohol can strengthen heart health has lingered ever since, even as additional analysis revealed that it actually causes cancer in humans.
Do drinkers live longer?
But you can also find data that suggests that non-drinkers live shorter lives than moderate drinkers – so which one is true?
For example, some people don’t drink because they are ill or have already suffered irreversible damage from former problem drinking. Most reports cannot differentiate between individuals who have never had an alcoholic beverage and those who drank intensely previously in their lives and after that stop.
Some of the social media stories about drinking are insane. Suggestions that Whiskey prevents heart attacks and Gin helps you lose weight are peddled constantly by the alcohol industry.
If these silly stories are true, and teetotalism are predisposed toward illness, then comparing drinkers to them will undervalue any unfavorable consequences that alcohol has.
The more you drink, the higher your risk
All we understand is that risk of getting a serious alcoholic illness increases the more alcohol you consume.” But without a dependable contrast cluster, it is difficult to claim exactly how disastrous those threats are.
The publishers of the current report in ‘The Lancet’ tried to deal with this issue, at least partially, by eliminating former alcoholics from their reference group, leaving only the sober by choice. To do so, they invested several years looking for every piece of alcohol research ever done that allowed them to draw out the specific information required.
They marked those that already omitted prior drinkers, which they believed would make the evaluation cluster more precise; to those that didn’t, they applied an algebraic model that would regulate for distinctions between their comparison cluster and that of the old favored reports.
The outcomes, which are broken down by age, gender, 197 geographic areas and 24 health issue recently connected with alcohol abuse, reveal that overall, compared with having no alcoholic beverages daily, having just one drink each day raises the danger of forming the majority of those diseases.
DNA may be the secret to healthy drinkers
This indicates that, generally, the benefits of abstaining from alcohol truly surpass the loss of any health and wellness improvements modest alcohol consumption has to offer.
The results, however, also reveal that a serving of alcohol daily slightly decreases the risk of specific kinds of cardiovascular disease, particularly in developed nations, where men and women are a lot more likely to live enough time to enjoy the benefit.
Therefore, in theory, if you are a daily drinker who makes it through the raised threat of liver failure or tumors that are more likely to attack young to middle-aged men and women, by retirement, when cardiovascular disease becomes a significant cause of mortality, your modest alcohol consumption might extend your lifespan.
But it’s a huge gamble!
It may be your inherent natural resilience and good DNA that kept you healthy enough to consume alcohol like this.
Big Alcohol is manipulating the data
Bear in mind that social research studies like these are not meant to immediately alter personal habits. They offer generalities, when it comes to the Lancet report, that alcohol use is most likely riskier and less potentially advantageous than we assumed, that might at some point influence policies, like higher tax bills on booze or warning stickers on wine bottles.
Is that enough to show people how to stop drinking alcohol, probably not!
Paradoxically, only if those policies, consequently, decrease the quantity that thousands of people drink will we understand whether doing this enhanced their general health and wellness.
In the immediate term, a superior way of recognizing the worth of clinical studies could be to think about each as a small modification of an eyeglass lens prescription. Everyone answers the question “Is it more clear like this, or like this?” and in doing this, brings our perspective of reality, our awareness of our own selves and the world around us into sharper focus.
Ready to kick the poison out?
If you are worried about your drinking, why not decide now to do something about it?
Click here to get started on the online course now. Or if you need more information click here to join us for a free quit drinking webinar and ebook download.
